Free forever·no account, no tracking, no third-party requests ·open data, free API
showstack / compare / sdi-vs-smpte-st-2110

SDI (Serial Digital Interface) vs SMPTE ST 2110

Do I still need SDI if the facility is going IP? Below is every field we hold on both, side by side. Each one is sourced on the individual entry, and anything nobody could source is left blank rather than guessed.

Side by side

SDI (Serial Digital Interface)SMPTE ST 2110
Categoryvideo-transportvideo-transport
FlowMedia — large, continuous, on time and in orderMedia — large, continuous, on time and in order
Transportother, fibreudp
Multicastyes
Spec availabilityopen-publishedpublished-paid
StewardSMPTE (Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers)SMPTE (Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers)
First published—2017
Statuscurrentcurrent
Our confidenceverifiedreported

Both are media flows. Anything that starves the link — usually a management transfer nobody scheduled — and jitter that outruns the receive buffer. That applies equally to either, so it is not a discriminator here.

What each one carries

Capability defined by the specification, not by any one product. A blank means the specification does not fix it, which is itself the answer on a transport like SRT.

SDI (Serial Digital Interface)SMPTE ST 2110
Sample rates48 kHz48 kHz
Audio bit depth24-bit16-bit, 24-bit
Audio channelsup to 16—
Audio encodingEmbedded AES3 in the ancillary data spaceST 2110-30, which is AES67
Resolution3840x2160Not fixed by the specification
Frame rateup to 60 HzNot fixed by the specification
Colour sampling4:2:2, 4:4:44:2:2, 4:4:4
Video bit depth10-bit, 12-bit8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Video compressionNone — uncompressedNone — uncompressed essence

SDI (Serial Digital Interface), audio: Sixteen channels in four groups, riding in the horizontal blanking.

SDI (Serial Digital Interface), video: 3840x2160 needs 12G-SDI on a single link; above that you are on two or four. The rate tiers are SD 270 Mbit/s, HD 1.485, 3G 2.97, 6G 5.94 and 12G 11.88. Cable reach falls as the rate rises, because coax loss goes with the square root of frequency and the frequency that matters is half the bit rate.

SMPTE ST 2110, audio: Essence streams are separate, so audio and video are independently routable — which is the whole point of 2110 and the reason lip sync becomes something you have to manage rather than something you get.

SMPTE ST 2110, video: ST 2110-20 is resolution and frame-rate agnostic by design; what limits you is the link. Uncompressed HD is around 1.5 Gbit/s and UHD around 12 Gbit/s, so the practical ceiling is the network rather than the standard. Audio travels separately in ST 2110-30 as AES67.

Speaks both (1)

These are the safe choices if you have not committed to either, or need to bridge the two.

SDI (Serial Digital Interface) only (7)

SMPTE ST 2110 only (6)

What goes wrong with SDI (Serial Digital Interface)

The bit rate is fixed by the standard, not by the picture. ST 259 is 143/270/360 Mb/s, ST 292-1 is 1.485 Gb/s (or 1.485/1.001), ST 2082-1 is 11.88 Gb/s. A "12G" run is really an 11.88 Gb/s run.
The connector is 75 ohm BNC per IEC 61169-8. 50 ohm BNCs are mechanically identical, will fit, will pass SD happily, and will then fail at 3G and 12G in a way that looks like a bad cable everywhere else in the chain.
Cable loss is specified at half the clock frequency, around 20 dB for ST 292-1. The same drum of cable that carries HD across a stadium will not carry 12G, so re-derate every existing run when you upgrade rate.
There is no negotiation, no handshake and no error correction. A marginal link produces sparkles or black frames, and the receiver reports lock rather than quality, so "it says it is locked" proves very little.
Audio, timecode and captions ride as ancillary data in the blanking intervals. Some converters, re-clockers and scalers pass video cleanly and drop ANC, so timecode and captions vanish with no error anywhere.
Return loss is specified at 15 dB and rise time at 270 ps for HD, 45 ps for 12G. Cheap patch panels and barrel connectors are the usual reason a 12G path that works on the bench fails in the rack.

What goes wrong with SMPTE ST 2110

Video, audio and ancillary data are separate streams with separate multicast addresses. Losing one leaves the others running, so "no audio" or "no timecode" can present as a perfectly healthy video path.
Everything hangs off PTP. ST 2110-10 defines the system timing model, so a grandmaster that steps, or two grandmasters fighting, takes the whole plant out at once rather than degrading gracefully.
ST 2110-20 video is genuinely uncompressed. Bandwidth is set by raster and frame rate, not by an average bitrate, so plan link capacity from the video format and leave headroom before you commit to a switch.
ST 2110-21 defines sender traffic shaping types. A sender and a receiver with mismatched shaping expectations gives intermittent picture breakup under load, not a clean failure you can point at.
ST 2110-30 audio is closely related to AES67 but the two do not automatically interoperate. Packet time and channel count profiles have to match on both ends before anything passes.
The suite is a dozen separate documents (ST 2110-10, -20, -21, -22, -30, -31, -40, -41, -43, plus RPs) and they are priced individually. Budget for the whole set, not one part number.

Sources

Disagree with any of this?

Every claim above comes from one of the two entries and carries a source. If one is wrong, correcting it is a single file and it fixes this page automatically. Edit SDI (Serial Digital Interface) or edit SMPTE ST 2110.